The results of the citation analysis performed in WoS, WoS CRS and GS are summarized in Table 13. Following indicators were used in WoS Core Collection: percentage of cited documents, total number of citations, citations per cited publication, maximum of citations, h- and m-indices, i10 (number of publications with at least 10 citations), and the number and percentage of Top 10 % and Top 1 % most cited publications calculated for each WoS category. Authors with a higher number of co-authors are usually not only the most productive ones, but also the ones who attract the highest impact scores. This might also refer to the fact, that WoS and SCOPUS include much more natural and engineering science journals than social science ones. Concerning the percentage of cited documents the results of the citation analysis are very similar to the ones reported for exercise 3. It is evident for this research field, that journal articles contribute most to the total impact assessed by the number of citations. ” offers. You might offer free shipping to a limited number of people or you could gift-wrap orders that are purchased prior to a certain date.

Table 13 shows that the values of the main citation indicators might differ in absolute values in GS, WoS Core Collection and WoS Cited Reference Search. However, the percentage of Rafael Book Cover chapters covered in GS is still low (around 55 %) but high in comparison to WoS (14.1 %) and WoS Cited Reference Search (32.9 %). The high coverage of Reports (Working Papers) is remarkable as well. Nevertheless, they correspond very well overall and thus, they are all valid and applicable in bibliometric studies. Similar trends are reported for the other publication types. The results show that the most cited publication types differ for each candidate on an individual level. Table 12 provides the results of the co-authorship analysis. The monograph provides researchers with the finest of stages for sustained and comprehensive-sometimes exhaustive and definitive-acts of scholarly inquiry. It might well seem-to risk a little hyperbole-that if the current academic climate fails to encourage scholars and researchers to turn to this particular device for thinking through a subject in full, it reduces the extent and coherence of what we know of the world. Some researchers prefer to publish their research within high ranking journal (incl. It must be stressed, however, that a high number of co-authors can be interpreted in many ways (strong cooperation but also undeserved or gift authorship) and needs in each particular case a deeper analysis basing on the role played by each author.

The number of publications covered in GS and not included in the candidates’ publication lists remained very low and were irrelevant for the citation analysis. In order to distinguish individual academic age periods, the year of the first publication activity has always been included. The cellulose-based engine of academic life in the humanities and social sciences, otherwise known as the monograph, is being increasingly displaced not by MacBooks or FaceBook but by its long-standing junior companion, the journal. This observation refers again to the better coverage of social science related research in GS rather than in WoS and Scopus. The coverage of Journal Articles is also much higher in GS than in WoS or Scopus (see a more detailed insight in Gorraiz and Gumpenberger 2015a, b). Table 7 shows the percentage of coverage in GS for each publication type. Furthermore, both data sources, WoS Cited Reference Search and GS included other publications not mentioned by the candidates in their publication lists. Table 10 shows the percentage of coverage in WoS, WoS Cited Reference Search and GS for each publication type.

Shows very different publication habits. Last, but not least, Table 14 shows a detailed citation analysis (including the total and mean number of citations, and the number of citations per cited items) in Google Scholar for each candidate of Exercise 4 and for the three most cited publication types monographs, book chapters and journal articles. As a consequence, a separate citation analysis of these publication types is then recommended for evaluation purposes. Like for the previously discussed appointments (see Fig. 1), the results hint at very heterogeneous and individual publication strategies based on the analysed publication types. Figure 2 represents the publication activity for each scientist according to the most relevant publication types. Before discussing the types of non-traditional publishing, we need a common vocabulary. In response, it proposes an alternative approach to monograph publishing based on a modular design for an online system that would foster, manage, and publish monographs in digital and print forms using open source software developments, drawn from journal publishing, and social networking technologies that might contribute to not only to the sustainability of monograph publishing but to the quality of the resulting books.