公開日:2021/10/10 / 最終更新日:2021/10/10

id=”article-body” class=”row” section=”article-body” data-component=”trackCWV”>

The Soundpeats Truengine 3 SE sound way better than their Cheapskate-exclusive $28 price tag would suggest.

Rick Broida/CNET

Lots and lots of companies ask me to write about their true wireless earbuds. Not many are willing to put their money where their mouth is, so to speak. It went down like this: The folks at Soundpeats invited me to try their new (at the time) Truengine 3 SE earbuds, noting that “some reviewers claim they’re better than .” Usually the comparison is to , so I was intrigued.

I responded that I didn’t have Galaxy Buds and therefore couldn’t do a direct comparison. No problem, they said, we’ll send you a pair to test for yourself.

Read more:

Challenge accepted. That’s some pretty bold confidence right there, especially considering the price disparity between these two. The Galaxy Buds Plus list for $150; the Soundpeats, for $50. And before I dive into the outcome of my testing, a deal: For a limited time, Cheapskate readers can get the after clipping the on-page 20%-off coupon and then applying promo code QXD8NZCY at checkout. That’s from Amazon seller HSL Tech. If you see a different one listed, the coupon and/or code might not be available. Last time around, the price was $37.

I want to make absolutely clear that the promise of “free Galaxy Buds” had zero bearing on my evaluation. Rather, I was glad to have the opportunity to test a premium product other than AirPods. (With rare exception, I focus on cheapie earbuds.) And now that this comparison is done, the Galaxy Buds are headed to the donation box.

Here’s the upshot: The Soundpeats earbuds sound good. Very good. Way better, in fact, than you’d expect for $37. Credit the dual dynamic drivers (same as Galaxy Buds have), Qualcomm 3020 chipset, or some other techno-blab I won’t pretend to understand. They’re just good.

Starting with a Spotify playlist called , I went back and forth with the two sets of earbuds. I don’t have the highly tuned ears of, say, CNET’s David Carnoy, but I will say I liked the Galaxy Buds just a little better overall. The sound quality seemed ever-so-slightly warmer. There were a few times I forgot which pair I had in, however, and found myself impressed by the sound and thinking, “Oh, these must be the Buds” — and they were the Truengine.

I’ll also note that the Galaxy Buds stayed put in my ears a little better thanks to their little fin — but that was an issue only while running. With the Soundpeats, I felt like they might fall out at any minute (though they never did, even after four miles). The Galaxy Buds can play longer on a charge, too — a whopping 11 hours, to the Soundpeats’ 6.5 — and they come in a case that supports wireless charging. The Soundpeats case is strictly USB-C.

Does any of that add up to a willingness to spend an extra $122? Definitely not. While I can’t agree the Truengine 3 SE earbuds are “better” than the Samsung Galaxy Buds Plus, I believe they’re a steal at $28.

Your thoughts?

This is an update of a story from September. Same product, bigger discount. Woot!

Read more:

Now playing:

Watch this:

Samsung Galaxy Buds+ are significantly improved

8:00

CNET’s Cheapskate scours the web for great deals on tech products and much more. For the latest deals and updates, follow the Cheapskate  and . Find more great buys on the  and check out our  for the latest promo codes from , ,  and . Questions about the Cheapskate blog? Find the answers on our .